: The aim of the present study is to predict a 1RM through the load-velocity relationship using the minimum velocity threshold (MVT) in a free-weight back squat. Twenty-five males and twenty-five females performed a 1RM test during a free-weight back squat, based on which individual load-velocity relationships were created. Ten regression models to predict the 1RM were developed. The models included a two-point (mean propulsive velocity (MPV) ≈ 1 m·s-1; MPV ≈ 0.50 m·s-1) and a three-point linear equation (MPV ≈ 1 m·s-1; MPV ≈ 0.75 m·s-1; and MPV ≈ 0.50 m·s-1) with an MVT of 0.3 m·s-1 and 0.4 m·s-1 and, additionally, an MVT of 0.25 m·s-1 for females. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the predicted and measured 1RM in males using an MVT of 0.30 m·s-1 and in females with an MVT of 0.25 m·s-1. In contrast, models using an MVT of 0.30 m·s-1 in females underestimated the measured 1RM, as did those using an MVT of 0.40 m·s-1 in both sexes. It appears possible to accurately predict the 1RM during a free-weight back squat using the load-velocity relationship. However, it is important to avoid using loads with velocities higher than 1 m·s-1 for the regression models and to use different MVTs for males and females.

How Does Load Selection and Sex Influence 1RM Prediction Using the Minimal Velocity Threshold During Free-Weight Back Squat?

Dello Stritto E.;Romagnoli R.;Piacentini M. F.
2025-01-01

Abstract

: The aim of the present study is to predict a 1RM through the load-velocity relationship using the minimum velocity threshold (MVT) in a free-weight back squat. Twenty-five males and twenty-five females performed a 1RM test during a free-weight back squat, based on which individual load-velocity relationships were created. Ten regression models to predict the 1RM were developed. The models included a two-point (mean propulsive velocity (MPV) ≈ 1 m·s-1; MPV ≈ 0.50 m·s-1) and a three-point linear equation (MPV ≈ 1 m·s-1; MPV ≈ 0.75 m·s-1; and MPV ≈ 0.50 m·s-1) with an MVT of 0.3 m·s-1 and 0.4 m·s-1 and, additionally, an MVT of 0.25 m·s-1 for females. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the predicted and measured 1RM in males using an MVT of 0.30 m·s-1 and in females with an MVT of 0.25 m·s-1. In contrast, models using an MVT of 0.30 m·s-1 in females underestimated the measured 1RM, as did those using an MVT of 0.40 m·s-1 in both sexes. It appears possible to accurately predict the 1RM during a free-weight back squat using the load-velocity relationship. However, it is important to avoid using loads with velocities higher than 1 m·s-1 for the regression models and to use different MVTs for males and females.
2025
injury prevention
load–velocity relationship
regression model
resistance training
sex difference
velocity-based training
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dello Stritto 2025 Load and sex influence on 1RM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 671.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
671.1 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14244/10573
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
social impact